File Name: social network theory and educational change .zip
District and school leaders play particularly important roles in leading districtwide improvement, as they are increasingly held accountable for bringing about change and improvement for educational innovation and excellence. While conventional districtwide governance places much of its focus on technical and administrative matters such as policy development, supervision, and monitoring progress. This technical focus often overlooks the fundamental aspect that drives the progress of improvement—the social infrastructure shaped by interpersonal relationship.
Using data from a multi-method comparative case study of two matched schools, this paper adds to the growing body of applications of social network analysis to the study of distributed leadership and accountability. We contrast two approaches to instructional leadership, prescriptive and discretionary, to investigate how leaders design professional networks to increase the availability and access of individuals with the expertise needed to perform the analysis required to conduct data-driven instructional improvement.
We found that the prescriptive approach to instructional leadership uses comprehensive school reform as a focal artifact to facilitate the widespread use of data for learning when compared to a leadership perspective that aimed at cultivating teacher discretion. We conclude with a discussion of how the concept of cognitive load helps illustrate the design principles leaders can use to create data-driven professional networks in schools. Anderson, L. The decline of teacher autonomy: tears or cheers?
International Review of Education, 33, Apple, M. Barham, E. Central control of the curriculum and teacher involvement in curriculum change. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 12, Black, P. Inside the black box--raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92 1 , Borgatti, S. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies. Bryk, A. Burt, R. Structural holes: The social structure of competition.
A note on social capital and network content. Social Networks, 19 4 , The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, Coburn, C. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, Coleman, J. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, SS Daly, A.
Social network theory and educational change. Data, dyads, and dissemination: Exploring data use and social networks in educational improvement. Teachers College Record. The rise of neurotics: Social networks, leadership, and efficacy in district reform. Educational Administration Quarterly. DOI: Datnow, A. Achieving with data: How high-performing school systems use data to improve instruction for elementary students.
Elmore, R. Building a new structure for school leadership. American Educator, 23 4 , Freeman, L. Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, Goertz, M. From testing to teaching: The use of interim assessments in classroom instruction Research Report Granovetter, M. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited.
Marsden and N. Lin Eds. Beverly Hills: Sage. Gronn, P. Distributed leadership. Hallinger Eds. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer. Halverson, R. Systems of practice: How leaders use artifacts to create professional community in schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11 What can K school leaders learn from video games and gaming?
Innovate, 1 6. Methods for accessing and assessing how school leaders improve teaching and learning. School formative feedback systems. Peabody Journal of Education, 85, The new instructional leadership: Creating data-driven instructional systems in school. Journal of School Leadership, 17, The roles and practices of student services staff as data-driven instructional leaders. Mangin and S. Stoelinga Eds. Instructional teachers leadership roles: Using research to inform and reform pp.
Teachers College Press: New York. Hamilton, L. Using student achievement data to support instructional decision making NCEE Department of Education. Hanneman, R. Introduction to social network methods. Horder, W.
British Journal of Social Work, 37 6 , Ibarra, H. Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, Inkpen, A.
Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30 1 , Jenkins, H. Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century.
Jennings, J. The effects of accountability system design on teachers' use of test score data. Teachers College Record, 11 , Krajcik, J. Teaching science in elementary and middle school classrooms: A project-based approach 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.
Practices that support data use in urban high schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10 3 , Le Floch, K. The U. Lin, N. Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Liou, Y. Closer to learning: Social networks, trust, and professional communities.
Social Network Theory and Educational Change offers a provocative and fascinating exploration of how social networks in schools can impede or facilitate the work of education reform. Drawing on the work of leading scholars, the book comprises a series of studies examining networks among teachers and school leaders, contrasting formal and informal organizational structures, and exploring the mechanisms by which ideas, information, and influence flow from person to person and group to group. The case studies provided in the book reflect a rich variety of approaches and methodologies, showcasing the range and power of this dynamic new mode of analysis. An introductory chapter places social network theory in context and explains the basic tools and concepts, while a concluding chapter points toward new directions in the field. Taken together, they make a powerful statement: that the success or failure of education reform ultimately is not solely the result of technical plans and blueprints, but of the relational ties that support or constrain the pace, depth, and direction of change. This unique volume provides an invaluable introduction to an emerging and increasingly important field of education research.
Kutipan per tahun. Kutipan duplikat. Artikel berikut digabungkan di Scholar. Paduan kutipannya hanya dihitung untuk artikel pertamanya saja. Kutipan yang digabung. Hitungan "Dikutip oleh" ini termasuk dalam kutipan yang ada pada artikel berikut di Scholar.
Metrics details. Social network analysis SNA literature suggests that leaders should be well connected and can be identified through network measurements. Other literature suggests that identifying leaders ideally involves multiple methods. However, it is unclear using SNA alone is sufficient for identifying leaders for higher education change initiatives. We used two sets of data, teaching discussion network data taken at three different times and respondent nominations for leaders, to determine whether these two methods identify the same individuals as leaders.
A social network is a social structure made up of a set of social actors such as individuals or organizations , sets of dyadic ties, and other social interactions between actors.Amedee Q. 23.03.2021 at 06:35
Afaa group fitness study guide pdf circle of friends book pdfButchesiting 23.03.2021 at 22:55
How social networks in schools can impede or facilitate the work of education reform or change.Ayrton P. 25.03.2021 at 01:48
Using data from a multi-method comparative case study of two matched schools, this paper adds to the growing body of applications of social network analysis to the study of distributed leadership and accountability.